//! Parallel planning agent for autonomous parallelization strategy optimization. use crate::{ agents::AutonomousAgent, error::AutoResult, proposal::{Proposal, ProposalType}, }; use rtx_graph::Graph; use rtx_runtime::Runtime; use std::sync::Arc; use tracing::info; /// Parallelization opportunity analysis. #[derive(Debug, Clone)] pub struct ParallelizationOpportunity { pub node_id: String, pub opportunity_type: ParallelType, pub estimated_speedup: f32, pub resource_requirements: ResourceRequirements, } #[derive(Debug, Clone)] pub enum ParallelType { DataParallel, ModelParallel, PipelineParallel, TensorParallel, } #[derive(Debug, Clone)] pub struct ResourceRequirements { pub min_devices: usize, pub memory_per_device: usize, pub communication_overhead: f32, } /// Agent for autonomous parallel execution planning. pub struct ParallelPlannerAgent { runtime: Arc, name: String, version: String, } impl ParallelPlannerAgent { pub fn new(runtime: Arc) -> AutoResult { Ok(Self { runtime, name: "ParallelPlannerAgent".to_string(), version: "1.0.0".to_string(), }) } pub async fn analyze_parallelization_opportunities( &self, graph: &Graph, ) -> AutoResult> { info!( "Analyzing parallelization opportunities for graph with {} nodes", graph.node_count() ); let mut opportunities = Vec::new(); // Analyze each node for parallelization potential for node in graph.nodes() { let node_id = node.id.to_string(); let op_name = node.operation.name(); // Identify compute-heavy operations suitable for different parallelization strategies match op_name { "Compute::MatMul" => { // MatMul is ideal for data parallelism (batch dimension) // and tensor parallelism (row/column splitting) opportunities.push(ParallelizationOpportunity { node_id: node_id.clone(), opportunity_type: ParallelType::DataParallel, estimated_speedup: self.estimate_data_parallel_speedup(graph, node), resource_requirements: ResourceRequirements { min_devices: 2, memory_per_device: 1024 * 1024 * 1024, // 1GB base communication_overhead: 0.05, // Low overhead for data parallel }, }); opportunities.push(ParallelizationOpportunity { node_id: node_id.clone(), opportunity_type: ParallelType::TensorParallel, estimated_speedup: self.estimate_tensor_parallel_speedup(graph, node), resource_requirements: ResourceRequirements { min_devices: 4, memory_per_device: 512 * 1024 * 1024, communication_overhead: 0.15, // AllReduce overhead }, }); } "Compute::Activation" | "Compute::BatchNorm" => { // Elementwise ops - good for data parallelism opportunities.push(ParallelizationOpportunity { node_id: node_id.clone(), opportunity_type: ParallelType::DataParallel, estimated_speedup: self.estimate_data_parallel_speedup(graph, node) * 0.9, resource_requirements: ResourceRequirements { min_devices: 2, memory_per_device: 256 * 1024 * 1024, communication_overhead: 0.02, }, }); } "Compute::Conv2d" => { // Conv2d benefits from both data and model parallelism opportunities.push(ParallelizationOpportunity { node_id: node_id.clone(), opportunity_type: ParallelType::DataParallel, estimated_speedup: self.estimate_data_parallel_speedup(graph, node) * 1.1, resource_requirements: ResourceRequirements { min_devices: 2, memory_per_device: 2048 * 1024 * 1024, communication_overhead: 0.08, }, }); opportunities.push(ParallelizationOpportunity { node_id: node_id.clone(), opportunity_type: ParallelType::ModelParallel, estimated_speedup: 2.0, resource_requirements: ResourceRequirements { min_devices: 2, memory_per_device: 1024 * 1024 * 1024, communication_overhead: 0.12, }, }); } _ => { // Generic operations - only suggest data parallelism if graph is large enough if graph.node_count() > 10 { opportunities.push(ParallelizationOpportunity { node_id: node_id.clone(), opportunity_type: ParallelType::DataParallel, estimated_speedup: 1.5, resource_requirements: ResourceRequirements { min_devices: 2, memory_per_device: 512 * 1024 * 1024, communication_overhead: 0.1, }, }); } } } } // Analyze graph depth for pipeline parallelism opportunities let graph_depth = self.calculate_graph_depth(graph); if graph_depth > 4 { opportunities.push(ParallelizationOpportunity { node_id: "pipeline_stages".to_string(), opportunity_type: ParallelType::PipelineParallel, estimated_speedup: self.estimate_pipeline_speedup(graph_depth), resource_requirements: ResourceRequirements { min_devices: graph_depth.min(8), memory_per_device: 1024 * 1024 * 1024, communication_overhead: 0.05 * graph_depth as f32, }, }); } // Sort by estimated speedup (highest first) opportunities.sort_by(|a, b| { b.estimated_speedup .partial_cmp(&a.estimated_speedup) .unwrap_or(std::cmp::Ordering::Equal) }); // Deduplicate by taking best opportunity per node let mut seen_nodes = std::collections::HashSet::new(); opportunities.retain(|op| { if seen_nodes.contains(&op.node_id) { false } else { seen_nodes.insert(op.node_id.clone()); true } }); Ok(opportunities) } /// Estimate speedup from data parallelism based on graph structure fn estimate_data_parallel_speedup(&self, graph: &Graph, _node: &rtx_graph::GraphNode) -> f32 { // Base speedup of 2x for 2 devices, with diminishing returns let node_count = graph.node_count(); let base_speedup = 2.0; // Larger graphs benefit more from data parallelism let scale_factor = (node_count as f32 / 10.0).min(2.0).max(1.0); base_speedup * scale_factor } /// Estimate speedup from tensor parallelism fn estimate_tensor_parallel_speedup(&self, graph: &Graph, _node: &rtx_graph::GraphNode) -> f32 { // Tensor parallelism has higher communication overhead but better for large tensors let node_count = graph.node_count(); let base_speedup = 1.8; // Works better for larger models let scale_factor = (node_count as f32 / 20.0).min(1.5).max(0.8); base_speedup * scale_factor } /// Estimate speedup from pipeline parallelism based on graph depth fn estimate_pipeline_speedup(&self, depth: usize) -> f32 { // Pipeline parallelism approaches linear speedup with depth, minus bubble overhead let ideal_speedup = depth as f32; let bubble_overhead = 1.0 / depth as f32; // Fraction of time in bubbles ideal_speedup * (1.0 - bubble_overhead) } /// Calculate the critical path depth of the graph fn calculate_graph_depth(&self, graph: &Graph) -> usize { // Simple heuristic: use edge count / node count ratio as depth estimate // A more accurate implementation would do topological traversal let nodes = graph.node_count(); let edges = graph.edge_count(); if nodes == 0 { return 0; } // Estimate depth based on graph density let density = edges as f32 / nodes as f32; // For sequential graphs, density ~= 1 (each node has one incoming edge) // For parallel graphs, density < 1 // For highly connected graphs, density > 1 if density <= 1.0 { // Mostly sequential - depth is approximately node count nodes.min(16) } else { // More parallel - depth is less than node count ((nodes as f32) / density).ceil() as usize } } pub async fn generate_data_parallel_proposals( &self, graph: &Graph, ) -> AutoResult> { let mut proposals = Vec::new(); let node_count = graph.node_count(); if node_count > 5 { // Calculate optimal batch splitting strategy let optimal_devices = (node_count / 5).min(8).max(2); let estimated_speedup = self.estimate_data_parallel_speedup(graph, graph.nodes().next().unwrap()); proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::DataParallel, format!( "Apply data parallelism across {} devices for {} compute nodes (estimated {:.1}x speedup)", optimal_devices, node_count, estimated_speedup ), estimated_speedup, )); // Gradient synchronization strategy if node_count > 20 { proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::DataParallel, "Use gradient compression (TopK or random) to reduce all-reduce communication overhead".to_string(), 1.4, )); } } Ok(proposals) } pub async fn generate_pipeline_parallel_proposals( &self, graph: &Graph, ) -> AutoResult> { let mut proposals = Vec::new(); let depth = self.calculate_graph_depth(graph); if depth > 4 { let num_stages = depth.min(8); let estimated_speedup = self.estimate_pipeline_speedup(depth); proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::PipelineParallel, format!( "Implement {}-stage pipeline parallelism for depth-{} graph (estimated {:.1}x speedup)", num_stages, depth, estimated_speedup ), estimated_speedup, )); // Micro-batch suggestion for pipeline efficiency if depth > 6 { proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::PipelineParallel, format!( "Use {} micro-batches to reduce pipeline bubble overhead", depth * 2 ), 1.3, )); } // Interleaved scheduling for better memory efficiency if depth > 8 { proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::PipelineParallel, "Apply interleaved 1F1B schedule to reduce peak memory usage by 50%" .to_string(), 1.2, )); } } Ok(proposals) } pub async fn generate_tensor_parallel_proposals( &self, graph: &Graph, ) -> AutoResult> { let mut proposals = Vec::new(); // Count large tensor operations let mut large_matmul_count = 0; let mut large_conv_count = 0; for node in graph.nodes() { match node.operation.name() { "Compute::MatMul" => large_matmul_count += 1, "Compute::Conv2d" => large_conv_count += 1, _ => {} } } if large_matmul_count > 0 { let estimated_speedup = self.estimate_tensor_parallel_speedup(graph, graph.nodes().next().unwrap()); proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::TensorParallel, format!( "Apply column-parallel tensor splitting to {} MatMul operations (estimated {:.1}x speedup)", large_matmul_count, estimated_speedup ), estimated_speedup, )); } if large_conv_count > 0 { proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::TensorParallel, format!( "Apply channel-parallel splitting to {} Conv2d operations", large_conv_count ), 2.0, )); } // Sequence parallelism for attention-heavy models if large_matmul_count > 10 { proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::TensorParallel, "Apply sequence parallelism for attention computation to reduce memory footprint" .to_string(), 1.8, )); } Ok(proposals) } pub async fn optimize_communication_patterns( &self, device_count: usize, ) -> AutoResult> { let mut proposals = Vec::new(); if device_count > 2 { // Ring all-reduce for larger device counts if device_count >= 4 { proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::CommunicationOptimization, format!( "Use ring all-reduce pattern for {} devices to achieve 2(n-1)/n bandwidth efficiency", device_count ), 1.5, )); } // Hierarchical all-reduce for very large clusters if device_count >= 8 { proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::CommunicationOptimization, format!( "Apply hierarchical all-reduce (intra-node then inter-node) for {} devices", device_count ), 1.8, )); } // Overlap communication with computation proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::CommunicationOptimization, format!( "Overlap gradient all-reduce with backward computation for {} devices", device_count ), 1.3, )); // NCCL optimization hints if device_count > 4 { proposals.push(Proposal::new( ProposalType::CommunicationOptimization, "Enable NCCL tree algorithm for large tensor all-reduce operations".to_string(), 1.2, )); } } Ok(proposals) } } impl AutonomousAgent for ParallelPlannerAgent { fn name(&self) -> &str { &self.name } fn version(&self) -> &str { &self.version } fn is_healthy(&self) -> bool { true } }