9575b848039051824f280681bd94db849532c3d9
1
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
698c844926 |
solvers: near-wall momentum, Newmark dynamics, QM6, and MMS across elements
CI / Test (ubuntu-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Build CPU-Only (Explicit) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Python Bindings (maturin) (macos-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Python Bindings (maturin) (ubuntu-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / WASM Build + Size Check (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Distributed Training Tests (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / CI Success (push) Canceled after 0s
Documentation / Build API Documentation (push) Canceled after 0s
Documentation / Build User Guide (push) Canceled after 0s
Performance Benchmarks / Run Benchmarks (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Format Check (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Clippy Check (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Build (macos-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Build (ubuntu-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / Test (macos-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
Four parallel work items plus two defects found while integrating them.
561 -> 592 tests, 0 failing, verified stable over repeated runs.
## rtx-cfd: solve the near-wall velocity lines
Every u row sits at y = (j+0.5) dy and every v column at x = (i+0.5) dx --
strictly interior. The sweeps froze rows 0 and ny-1 and columns 0 and
nx-1 and treated whatever was stored there as a boundary condition, which
imposed wall values half a cell inside the domain. They are now unknowns,
with the wall entering through the control volume's half-cell conductance
(mu dx / (dy/2)), zero convective flux through the wall, and the wall's
tangential velocity in the source.
That in turn makes continuity enforceable on every cell, with a neighbour
coefficient zero only for a genuine boundary face. Extending continuity
had been tried before and broke convergence; it works now because the
near-wall lines are no longer frozen. Order matters here.
Manufactured solutions, which is how any of this is known:
n L2 velocity order max |p - p_exact|
16 3.516212e-2 - 9.245576e-2
32 1.953751e-2 0.85 5.225739e-2
64 1.037523e-2 0.91 2.796415e-2
Velocity error is 7.4x smaller at n=16, and the observed order rises from
0.48 toward 1. The pressure error was 0.408 -> 0.624 -> 0.756, *growing*
with refinement; it now falls. Divergence on the outer ring of cells goes
from 1.0e1 to 2.5e-10.
A separate defect found on the way: u_source_term was computed and never
called, so the x-momentum equation carried no body force at all while the
y-momentum one did. That is exactly the u-versus-v asymmetry the earlier
diagnosis had flagged as an unexplained clue.
Cavity at 65^2, against Ghia's u_min = -0.2109 at y = 0.4531:
-0.1792 at 0.3906 before, -0.1932 at 0.5000 after, in 733 iterations
rather than 971.
The cavity test now sets FreeSlipWall on all four sides plus the lid
through the new set_wall_velocity hook. That is not a weakened benchmark:
on a staggered grid the only velocity component living *on* a boundary is
the normal one, which is what FreeSlipWall prescribes, and the tangential
no-slip arrives through the half-cell wall term with wall velocity zero on
the three stationary walls. Prescribing whole u rows and v columns, as
before, pins lines half a cell inside the domain and over-determines the
cells beside them once every cell has a continuity equation.
## rtx-fea: DynamicAnalysis, previously a stub returning zeros
Newmark-beta in acceleration form -- the displacement form divides by
beta dt^2, singular at beta = 0 -- with Rayleigh damping, the effective
matrix Cholesky-factorised once and reused. Initial acceleration is solved
from M a0 = F0 - C v0 - K u0 rather than assumed zero, which would destroy
the second-order rate.
Verified two ways that cannot both be faked: against the closed-form
single-degree-of-freedom response, undamped and damped, with the measured
order of accuracy; and against the free-vibration period of the same bar
whose modal frequencies are already validated. Time domain and frequency
domain come from different code paths.
## rtx-fea: QM6 incompatible modes
Wilson's Q6 with Taylor's correction, added alongside compute_stiffness_
matrix rather than replacing it -- the existing method is byte-identical,
which matters because the manufactured-solution verification depends on
it. Internal modes statically condensed; the incompatible strain block
evaluated at the element centre, which is what makes the patch test pass
on distorted elements.
## rtx-fea: manufactured solutions across the element library
Quad4 order 2.00 Tri3 order 1.98
Quad8 order 3.00 Hex8 order 1.96 (new 3-D solution)
Each element asserts its own theoretical rate.
## Two defects found while integrating
Reverse Cuthill-McKee node ordering was nondeterministic. All three of its
orderings -- seed selection, neighbour ordering, and the trailing sweep --
were decided by HashMap/HashSet iteration order, which std randomises per
process. On a rectangular mesh every corner ties at minimum degree, so two
calls to displacement_only on the same mesh in the same process returned
different DOF indices for the same node, agreeing in only 5 of 20 measured
runs. Ties now break by node id. This surfaced as a coin-flip test failure
-- 12 in 25 runs -- and would have been dismissed as flaky rather than
diagnosed had the integration pass not re-run it.
Quadrature: triangle(3) weights summed to 0.25 against a reference area of
0.5, and tetrahedron(3) to 1/36 against a volume of 1/6. Both divided
weights that were already tabulated for the reference measure by that
measure again, so both rules integrated everything to a fraction of its
value -- invisibly, since a scaled quadrature leaves the stiffness matrix
symmetric, the mass matrix positive definite and the rigid-body modes
exact. New test asserts every rule integrates 1 to its reference measure,
across every family and order, plus Gauss-Legendre exactness to degree
2n-1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
|