2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 5	e30cfe4ce9	rtx-fea: repair the element library; the crate is now green with no quarantine ... Follows the assembly repair. Takes rtx-fea from 21 failures to 253 passing, 0 failing, 0 ignored, with every `#[ignore]` marker gone. Shape function bugs, all found by one new test asserting two invariants across the whole element library at once -- partition of unity, and that the hand-written derivatives sum to zero. The second is the one that gets skipped, and it is what caught Hexahedron20. - Wedge15 summed to 2 at mid-height. Adding a node on a vertical edge contributes L_i (1 - t^2) to the sum, so the two corners sharing that edge must each give up half of it; the correction was absent. A quadratic wedge that doubles every field interpolated through it. - Hexahedron20 had sign errors in four hand-written corner derivatives -- nodes 3 and 7 in dN/dr, nodes 1 and 5 in dN/ds. The values were correct, so partition of unity passed; only the derivative-sum invariant exposed it. The strain computed from this element was wrong while its interpolation looked right. - Quadrilateral9 emitted its shape functions in raw lexicographic lattice order while Quad4 and Quad8 use the standard finite-element order. A mesh written the usual way paired each node with the wrong basis function, which at the element centre made the Jacobian exactly singular. - Pyramid13 was not a quadratic pyramid basis: it summed to 4 at the element centre, and its `derivatives` allocated a 13x3 matrix then wrote rows 13 through 15, having been copied from a sixteen-node layout, so it panicked before the wrong values could be used. A correct 13-node basis is rational, and there is no pyramid quadrature rule to integrate it with, so implementing the basis alone would not make the element usable. Both now report the gap explicitly rather than panicking. Pyramid5 is unaffected and works. Fixtures corrected rather than tolerances loosened: - von Mises stress of an equal biaxial state expected 0, commented "no deviatoric stress". Only a hydrostatic state has that. The correct value is 100, and expecting 0 would mean a biaxially loaded sheet could never yield. The unequal case expected |100-50|; the von Mises stress is not a principal difference. - A 3-point Gauss rule was required to integrate sin to 1e-10. No correct implementation can. Replaced with a convergence assertion, which a wrong rule cannot satisfy by luck. - MathUtils::SMALL was asserted below EPSILON * 1000, which inverts the relationship a practical zero-threshold needs. - The Hex20 Jacobian test put all twelve mid-edge nodes at the origin, commented "simplified for test". That is not a hexahedron, and its mapping is genuinely singular; it only passed because of the derivative sign errors above. - ElementFactory was required to build every ElementType including Point, which has no interpolation and is deliberately rejected. MemoryInfo displayed decimal GB while its own test constructed binary GiB, rendering an 8 GiB device as 8.59. Now GiB throughout. test_mesh_has_real_algorithms searched the *text* of mesh/mod.rs for the strings "add_node" and "add_element". It broke when those moved into submodules, but the real problem is that a source-text search cannot tell a working function from one returning zeros -- it passed throughout the period when element matrices were a stub and quadrature returned no points. Replaced with a test that builds a mesh and checks the result. The crate doc example imported solvers::DirectSolver and analysis::StaticAnalysis, neither of which has ever existed, so the doctest never compiled. Replaced with a modal analysis that runs. Also dropped the "Production Ready: No mocks, stubs, or TODOs - complete implementation" line, and replaced it with what is actually validated and what is not. rtx-fsi unaffected at 26/26. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>	2026-08-19 08:21:58 -07:00
redclawsystems	4d88dc0584	Initial commit	2026-03-04 00:08:42 +00:00