- README's "HDF5 Core I/O" table claimed 19ns/2,080µs labeled 308× (real ratio
~109,000×) and a 313ns zero-copy mmap figure — neither traced to any dated
benchmark in BENCHMARKS.md. Replaced the table wholesale with the existing
"vs libhdf5 Summary" figures, relabeled from "h5py/C HDF5" to "libhdf5"
(BENCHMARKS.md never benchmarks against h5py, only libhdf5 directly).
- Added two new Criterion benchmarks to close the coverage gaps that produced
the untraceable numbers: metadata_open_from_disk (I/O-inclusive, fair
clawhdf5-vs-libhdf5 file-open comparison) and metadata_parse_in_memory
(clawhdf5-only, explicitly labeled as excluding I/O) in h5bench_meta.rs;
read_zerocopy_mmap in h5bench_read.rs (forces real page-ins by summing
elements rather than just returning a slice length — the mmap path turns
out to be slower than a plain copy at these sizes, an honest, unflattering
but real result now documented instead of a fabricated 313ns).
- Re-ran the full existing benchmark suite plus the two new ones on a second,
independently administered machine (tank: Ryzen 7 7800X3D) to validate the
numbers before publishing them. 5 of 6 rows landed within ~15% of the
original i7-12650H figures; recorded both in BENCHMARKS.md's new
"Independent Validation" section. README now cites the tank numbers.
- Added a short top-of-file README callout naming both halves of the project
(general-purpose HDF5 library vs. agent memory layer) with links to
BENCHMARKS.md and the Crate Map, so a data-infra reader isn't 60% through
a memory-store pitch before finding the part relevant to them.
- Added one factual, no-names line noting benchmark numbers are being
validated in collaboration with HDF5 Group engineers.
- Fixed the same untraceable "2-300x faster than h5py/C HDF5" / "313 ns"
claims in docs/QUICKSTART.md, one click from the README's own "New here?"
link.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <[email protected]>
Following arXiv:2506.18062 (TDT pre-filter) and matching h5py default
behavior: the shuffle filter is now automatically applied before any
compression codec (deflate, Zstd, LZ4, Pcodec) unless explicitly
disabled with .without_shuffle().
Benchmark results (f32 matrices, shuffle+codec vs unshuffled baseline):
- Zstd-3 at 512×512: 610 → 764 MiB/s (+25%)
- Deflate-6 at 128×128: 132 → 401 MiB/s (+204%)
- Deflate-6 at 512×512: 280 → 745 MiB/s (+166%)
Both codecs now reach parity at ~750 MiB/s for large matrices.
Changes:
- Add no_shuffle field to ChunkOptions (opt-out via .without_shuffle())
- Auto-add FILTER_SHUFFLE in build_pipeline() when compression is active
- Add DatasetBuilder.without_shuffle() method
- Update pipeline tests to reflect new 2-filter default
- Add chunk_options_pipeline_deflate_no_shuffle test
- Update BENCHMARKS.md with measured throughput improvements
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <[email protected]>
Implements Pcodec (filter ID 32023) via the `pco` 1.0.x crate as a new
optional compression codec. Pcodec achieves 30–94% better compression
ratio than Zstd for f32/f64 columnar data at 1–5 GiB/s decompression
speed, making it ideal for write-once/read-many embedding archives.
Write throughput at 512×512: 591 MiB/s (parity with Zstd-3 at 610 MiB/s).
For smaller chunks Zstd-3 remains faster due to Pcodec's fixed per-chunk
distributional analysis overhead.
- Add FILTER_PCODEC = 32023 constant to filter_pipeline.rs
- Add pcodec_compress/pcodec_decompress using pco::standalone API
- Wire into compress_chunk/decompress_chunk dispatch
- Add ChunkOptions.pcodec field and DatasetBuilder.with_pcodec() method
- Enable pcodec as highest-priority codec in build_pipeline()
- Add pco dep (optional, feature = "pcodec") to clawhdf5-format/clawhdf5
- Add write_2d_chunked_pcodec benchmark comparing pcodec vs zstd-3
- Document results in BENCHMARKS.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <[email protected]>
Add features = ["zstd"] to clawhdf5-bench dev-dependency so the
write_2d_chunked_zstd benchmark no longer panics with UnsupportedFilter(32015).
Update BENCHMARKS.md and README.md with measured results from the full
h5bench write suite (2026-06-30, post write-performance improvements):
- Zstd-3 hits 593 MiB/s at 512×512 vs deflate-6's 280 MiB/s (2.12×)
- Zstd-3 hits 330 MiB/s at 128×128 vs deflate-6's 132 MiB/s (2.51×)
- Sequential f64 batch write improved ~8-11% from owned-Vec IO path
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <[email protected]>
