Regenerated on tank: ok 600 -> 602 (attr_datatypes.hdf5 and
tcomplex_be.h5, compared against h5py's big-endian VL values corrected),
mismatch 2 -> 0; cve-2025-2308.h5 and cve-2025-44904.h5 are ref-bug
(h5py's values varied across six heaps in this run);
bad_nbit_parms_walk.h5 read the same in all six this run, so it stays
our-error, as the classification rule requires. Baseline raised.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Regenerated on tank: ok 599 -> 600 (h5ex_d_zfp.h5), our-error 4 -> 3,
mismatch 2, no panics, hangs, crashes or OOM. Baseline raised.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Regenerated on tank: ok 575 -> 599, our-error 10 -> 4, mismatch 20 -> 2,
no panics, hangs, crashes or OOM. Newly ok: metadata-cache-image files,
the CVE open-time checks, v1 chunk-key lookup as libhdf5 does it, the
scale-offset fixes, Blosc2, and harness corrections. Baseline raised.
h5rs check --data flags none of the 435 fully-read ok files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
Regenerated on tank at 10d1029: ok 467 -> 569, our-error 123 -> 14,
mismatch 15 -> 22 (six user-defined-link files moved from our-error to a
listing difference), no panics, hangs, crashes or OOM. Baseline raised.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
