docs: withdraw the ZeroClaw integration claims
CLAUDE.md said ZeroClaw "imports this as a Cargo feature (clawhdf5 feature flag)" and uses clawhdf5 as its memory backend; the agent crate called itself the "ZeroClaw agent memory HDF5 backend"; the migrator claimed to read "the ZeroClaw layout". Checked on 2026-09-25 against ZeroClaw v0.8.5 (its latest release), the osobh/zeroclaw fork (on v0.8.5) and both histories back to February 2026: - no `clawhdf5` feature, dependency or memory backend has ever existed in ZeroClaw; its backends are sqlite, lucid, postgres, qdrant, markdown and none, behind its own `Memory` trait; - ZeroClaw's SQLite schema is a single `memories` table (id, key, content, category, embedding, created_at, updated_at); the migrator's memory_chunks/sessions/entities/relations layout never existed in ZeroClaw, so it cannot read a ZeroClaw database. Decision: withdraw the claims (as with OpenClaw); clawhdf5 is a standalone library with no framework integration. The migrator's default layout is documented as its own. ZEROCLAW_VERSION keeps its name and value (it is the persisted `edgehdf5_version` writer tag) with a doc comment saying it is unrelated to ZeroClaw. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -818,7 +818,9 @@ clawhdf5-migrate --sqlite old.db --hdf5 memory.h5 --agent-id my-agent --embedder
|
||||
|
||||
The output is an ordinary `clawhdf5-agent` store, written through the agent's
|
||||
own API: open it with `HDF5Memory::open` (or `clawhdf5-cli --path memory.h5 …`)
|
||||
and search it straight away. What carries over from the ZeroClaw tables:
|
||||
and search it straight away. The source must use the `memory_chunks` / `sessions` / `entities` / `relations` layout (names are
|
||||
configurable with `--*-table`); note that this is not ZeroClaw's schema, and
|
||||
ZeroClaw does not use clawhdf5. What carries over:
|
||||
|
||||
| SQLite | Agent store |
|
||||
|--------|-------------|
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user