clawmates/docs/CAPABILITY-REVIEW.md

ClawMates capability review

2026-08-19. What exists, what is wired, what was repaired in this pass, and what is deferred with reasons.

Inventory

Crates	19 libraries + 4 binaries (clawmates-server, -broker, -node, fcagent)
HTTP	181 routes / 207 method+handler pairs across 39 route modules
Workers	21 background loops, 2s (approval resume) to 24h (tool versions)
Database	79 migrations, ~90 tables
Templates	6 workflow recipes, 11 team templates, 53 authored skills (was 30)
Frontend	6 tiers (VIZ · MISSIONS · AGENT · PODCAST · REPOS · INFRA), ~57 dashboard components
Execution	5 paths: container/ZeroClaw, microVM solo, composed microVM graph, local herdr, direct headless session

Dead-code hygiene is genuinely excellent: no todo!, no unimplemented!, no stray TODO in production paths. Every defect found in this review was a wiring defect — code that was correct, reachable by nothing, and reported as working.

Where skills come from

Asked directly, and worth recording because it was not answerable from any document before now.

• All 53 catalogue skills are hand-authored markdown committed to skills/**/*.md, ingested at boot by skills_loader with source_kind='builtin', workspace_id = NULL. None are generated at runtime and none are pulled from anywhere.

• An LLM-authoring path exists and is fully wired: level_up.rs:435 calls a model (default glm:glm-4.7) whose prompt asks for skill_candidate items carrying a complete draft.body. Nothing is written to skills at propose time — the payload sits in level_up_proposals as pending.

• Application WAS gated on a human click, and as of 2026-08-19 is not. apply() still honours approved_item_ids for the manual path, but skill_self_authoring now sweeps pending proposals every two minutes and applies their skill_candidate items autonomously, by operator decision. What replaces the gate is not another gate but four properties, each held by a test in tests/skill_self_authoring.rs:

  • the write is workspace-scoped (workspace_id set, never NULL), so it can never modify a hand-authored skill;
  • a draft cannot take a hand-authored skill's name — ids are scoped and bindings resolve by skill_id, so it could not overwrite or shadow one anyway, but two procedures under one name means nobody reading a transcript can tell which the agent followed;
  • every revision appends a skill_versions row, so a self-authored skill can be reverted and a past run can be read back against the text it was actually judged under;
  • the proposal lands with approved_by = NULL — an agent's decision is never attributed to a person who did not make it.

  identity_refinement and brain_consolidation still wait for a human: they change what an agent is rather than adding a procedure it can consult. Off by default since 2026-09-20 — no agent-authored skill had ever been delivered to a mission or scored, and prod held zero proposals. Enable with CLAWMATES_SKILL_SELF_AUTHORING=1; the state is announced at boot either way.

• No external registry feeds the catalogue. ClawBrainHub trades .brain files and never touches the skills table. cm_db::repo::skills::create — the only path that would produce source_kind='hand_authored' — has no production caller.

So the only way a skill enters the catalogue today is a committed markdown file or an operator approving an agent's draft.

The theme

Everything below is one shape, the project's own "silent-success" class: a capability is built, a second layer does not connect to it, and every layer reports success. It is not carelessness. In four of the six cases the belief that the wire existed was written down in a doc comment, and no test asked.

That is the actionable lesson: a comment asserting a connection is not evidence of one. Two of the audit's own findings that fed this plan were themselves wrong in the same way, and the registry whose job is to record which config keys are read was inaccurate in both directions.

What was repaired

1. Skill bindings — 55 of 85 resolved to nothing

Only 30 skills were authored; 10 of 11 templates referenced names that did not exist. Three roles bound zero skills while their prompts described procedures to follow.

Invisible because both existing tests assert authored ⊆ referenced (30/30, green) and one explicitly declines to check the other direction.

Fixed: 23 skills authored, renames onto real skills, 22 aspirational references deleted. Two tests now hold it — one against the files, one against the database (different questions: resolution goes through catalogue rows, so a file that exists but fails to ingest still leaves the role empty).

2. Skills could not reach a mission agent at all

The larger finding, and the reason #1 was never noticed. The catalogue's only delivery channel was the clawmates_skills MCP server, and a mission claw could not reach it for three independent reasons:

• provision_claw wrote the constant ["clawmates_door"], ignoring the template's mcp_bundles — which mission_orchestrator had already stored.
• The runtime config defines no clawmates_skills bundle. (The live local config defines no bundles at all, not even the door.)
• Mission claws run on claude_cli, which the runtime's own config comments document as text-only: it cannot surface a tool call, so no MCP server is reachable from a mission turn regardless.

And a mission turn's entire system context is two sentences synthesised from the role slot (topology_exec::build_prompt) — the template's role prose is not used either, which mission_orchestrator documents.

So every skill authored for a mission role was unreachable prose, and the Skill-Use measurement this review planned could only ever have returned zero.

Fixed on the container/ZeroClaw tier only: provision_claw now provisions the template's bundles (door always added), and the pinned skills are injected as bodies into the turn prompt — not an index, because there is no skills.read tool on this path and an index would advertise a capability that does not exist.

The correction matters, because the first version of this document said "mission agents" without qualifying the tier. compose_turn_prompt / pinned_skills_text have exactly one production caller (topology_exec.rs:745), which topology_worker drives. phase_runner's three other paths do not call it:

Path	Entry point	Skills reach the agent?
Container / ZeroClaw (the default)	topology_worker → ZeroClawDriveExecutor	yes
Composed microVM	phase_runner::launch_composed_microvm_phase	not yet
Solo microVM	microvm_executor::run_phase_in_vm	not yet
Direct session	phase_runner::launch_direct_session	not yet

3. upsert_task raised 42P10 on every call

mission_tasks_external_uniq is a partial unique index. Postgres will not match a partial index to an ON CONFLICT target unless the statement repeats the predicate. Both callers — the task-card parser that turns INT markers into tasks, and the security scanner — map the error to a string their caller logs.

Two features were broken for as long as they have existed, and nothing was red.

4. The security scan phase never scanned

security_scan::run was reachable only from an operator button. So security_hardening.toml — a workflow whose entire first phase is a scan — ran an agent that was never told to scan, and never fired the scanner either. Now swept by phase_runner, mirroring the benchmark baseline sweep added earlier for the identical defect, guarded on a completion marker (a clean scan writes no findings, so a findings-guard would rescan forever).

5. Two recipes could not fail

security_hardening.toml and benchmark.toml carried no task and no done_when on any phase. Without done_when a phase never enters evaluating, is never judged, and reports completed whatever it did. Both now state the work and the condition.

6. Smaller wiring

• CLAWMATES_JUDGE_MODEL had two different defaults and a doc comment naming a third; one source now.
• GITEA_TOKEN absence is stated rather than degrading into the same message a private repo produces.
• phase_config's registry corrected: harness and tools were listed NOT IMPLEMENTED while fully read; bench_name/cmd added; test_command deleted (no reader and no writer).

Verification

• Full workspace suite green.
• Every fix has a test, and every test was negative-controlled: the skills test failed naming all 55; reverting the ON CONFLICT predicate reproduces 42P10 exactly; reverting one skill name fails naming that exact role.
• Local stack boots; test-server path (scripts/test-server.sh up) is required for the integration suite, otherwise cm-testkit falls back to a testcontainer that times out.

Deferred, with reasons

• mission_plan / mission_roster have no frontend. Shipped 2026-08-19. MissionProposalDrawer reaches both flows from a mission's SETUP tab. Verified end to end against the live backend: a model proposed a roster, approval flipped the mission to the composed engine, and approval on a non-draft mission is refused.

  Building it surfaced a defect in the backend it consumes: every refusal path computed a precise reason, logged it to stderr, and returned a bare {"error":"bad request"}. The person who needed the sentence was the one clicking Approve. ApiError::Refused(String) now carries it — the same argument ApiError::Unavailable was added for, one status code down.

• Skill-Use measurement (Trigger / Compliance / Boundary). Deferred not for cost but because it was unmeasurable until this pass: with no delivery channel, trigger rate was structurally zero. It is now worth running, and it is the natural next step.

• Provenance layer. Assessed only, by decision — see PROVENANCE-ASSESSMENT.md.

• Graph memory / clawhdf5-agent. Declared in the workspace manifest, used by no crate. The matched study (MemoryLake on MemoryArena) shows structured memory winning modestly on low absolute numbers, and Harness the Memory finds excessive retrieval actively harms agent decisions. Measure against a baseline before migrating.

• Test coverage, re-examined. The original entry ranked crates by raw test count. That was a shallow metric and it was misleading: cm-safety's seven tests already cover the CAS on decide, grant double-consume, expiry, and the approved/rejected split, and the audit_log immutability trigger is tested in cm-db. Counting tests found the wrong crates.

  Reading the API surface against the tests found the right ones:

  • verify_slack_signature had no replay protection — fixed, see below.
  • credits_for_tokens was untested — pure pricing arithmetic, now pinned including the round-up contract and an overflow case.

  Genuinely still thin: cm-brain, where 6 of 9 tests need live clawbrainhub.com so the whole hub client is unexercised offline. Stubbing it means reproducing an external registry protocol we have no spec for, which is its own piece of work rather than a coverage chore.

• A Slack request could be replayed forever. slack_signature_valid verified the HMAC correctly and nothing anywhere checked the timestamp's age — it was only an input to the basestring, so an old request's signature verified exactly as well as a fresh one. Anyone holding one captured signed request could replay it indefinitely. Slack's documented 5-minute window is now enforced in the broker, not the caller, because the broker does not trust its caller and a check the caller can forget will eventually be forgotten. Symmetric, so a far-future timestamp cannot mint a long-lived request.

• ZEROCLAW_GATEWAY_URL / _TOKEN fail at first use, not boot. Fixed 2026-08-19. gateway_preflight reports at startup, the third sibling of runtime_preflight and validator_preflight. A report, not a gate — every read path works without a gateway, and refusing to boot would turn a degraded deployment into a dead one. The message names the consequence ("container-tier missions cannot run") rather than just the missing variable.

• gitea_forge resolves to nothing. Resolved 2026-08-19 by removing the name. It was harmless while provision_claw ignored the bundle list; once the list was honoured, an undefined name became a capability an agent is told it has and does not. Removed from seven team templates, one workflow recipe, the auto-provision path and a user-selectable dropdown. web_fetch went the same way — and a new test (team_template_loader::bundle_tests) now asserts every bundle a template names is defined in the runtime config, which is what found web_fetch in two templates I had missed by hand. Agents reach the forge through git over HTTPS with the ambient GITEA_TOKEN, which is why nothing ever broke.

• The deployed runtime config is not the example. [mcp_bundles.clawmates_skills] is now in agent.config.example.toml, but the live local config carries no bundle definitions at all — a fresh deploy needs the example's blocks. The prompt-injection path does not depend on this, which is why it was the fix chosen for the mission tier.

The one process change worth making

Every defect above was found by checking a claim instead of reading it. The existing runtime_preflight module is the pattern that works: it asks the running container what it actually has and says so at boot, because "the code is right and the machine is not" produced no error anywhere.

The equivalent check for this pass — does a provisioned agent actually receive the bundles and skills its template names — does not exist yet, and is the cheapest guard against all of this recurring.