Files
clawmates/skills/research/executive-summary-writing.md
T
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 5 a2d7e3ea92
deploy / test (push) Successful in 4m4s
deploy / build (push) Successful in 1m45s
feat(skills): author the Continuous Research skills, and make its roles honest
The boot log has said `continuous_research — 4 role skills bound, 8 unresolved`
on every start. Those eight roles ran without the instructions their template
promised them, silently: `skills_loader` reports the miss and carries on.

Worse than the missing files was what the prompts described. v1 told the
harvester to sweep "RSS feeds, GitHub trending, HN front page, YouTube /
podcast RSS" — none of which exist. `harvest.rs` searches arXiv and nothing
else. A role prompt describing a machine that was never built is the failure
this codebase keeps paying for, so v2 describes the machine that exists.

Roles now match the pipeline: paper_reader (the harvest already ran; read the
manifest and the papers), signal_ranker (unchanged in spirit), script_writer
(the podcast half, which had no role at all).

Seven skills authored under skills/research/, kebab-case to match the loader —
team_template_loader.rs:177-181 documents the snake_case/kebab-case trap that
already unbinds skills elsewhere:

  arxiv-daily                  what the harvest guarantees, so an agent does
                               NOT re-search arXiv and corrupt the seen-set
  paper-to-project-relevance   name a file or roadmap item, or say "no bearing"
  duplicate-detection          the seen-set catches identity; this catches the
                               same work under a different id
  signal-to-noise-ranking      novelty/relevance/depth, and the two biases to
                               resist (recency up, inconvenience down)
  executive-summary-writing    what it is / why it matters / what to do — decide,
                               do not hedge
  obsidian-vault-conventions   the vault is a human's live workspace; never
                               main, never reorganise, hash the body not the file
  podcast-dialogue-writing     write for someone on a treadmill; the 10-70 char
                               highlight bound is the API's, not a style rule

`web_fetch` dropped from mcp_bundles: runtime_provision.rs binds every mission
claw to `["clawmates_door"]` and never reads that field, so declaring it
instructed roles to use a tool that never arrived. The prompts say `curl` via
Bash, which is what they actually have.

Boot now reports `continuous_research — 11 role skills bound`, with no
unresolved clause. 344 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
2026-08-17 14:44:03 -07:00

1.9 KiB

name, description, when_to_use, tags
name description when_to_use tags
executive-summary-writing Writing the three-part item entry — what it is, why it matters to us, what to do — so a digest is readable in two minutes. You are writing digest or analysis entries for harvested research items.
research
writing

The three-part entry

Every item gets exactly three parts. The shape is the discipline: it makes the omissions visible.

What it is — one sentence, what they actually did. Not what it enables, not why it is exciting. If you cannot state the contribution in one sentence you have not finished reading.

Why it matters to us — the named project, file or open question it touches. If nothing applies, the item does not belong in the digest. That rule is what keeps a digest from becoming a feed.

What to do about it — one decision, from a closed set:

read fully     worth an hour of someone's time
add to backlog a concrete change we should make
ignore         seen, judged, not for us
escalate       changes a plan we are currently executing

Decide; do not hedge

"Consider evaluating whether this might inform our approach" is four words of decision wrapped in ten of insulation. Write ignore or write add to backlog. Being wrong in a specific direction is recoverable; being vague is not, because nobody can tell later whether the call was right.

Two minutes, total

Not two minutes per item — two minutes for the digest. Five items at three sentences each is roughly the budget. If an item needs more, it is not a digest entry, it is a reading note: link to it and keep the entry short.

Frontmatter carries the ratio

---
date: 2026-08-17
harvested: 23
surfaced: 4
---

Harvested-versus-surfaced tracked over time is how you notice selectivity drift. A run that surfaces everything has stopped filtering; a run that surfaces nothing for a week is either a quiet field or a broken harvest, and the counts are what tell you which.