f56d41f5b7164a97c8c780bf4ddcb4e2c356afef
8
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Omar SobhandClaude Opus 5
|
f7f3dfe495 |
feat(fleet): GLM as a real microVM backend, and per-role models for claws
Three threads, all of which end at the same place: a mission whose verifier does
not share a model with the coder it reviews.
**GLM has a credential contract now.** `microvm_credential_for` returned one env
var name, which quietly assumed every provider reads its secret from the same
place Anthropic does. It returns a `Credential { source, target }` instead —
z.ai's key lives in the server's `ZAI_API_KEY` and Claude Code reads it as
`ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN`, and collapsing those two names is what forces a guess at
the other end. A wrong guess here sends one provider's credential to another
provider's endpoint.
`images/agent-glm` is the same CLI at the same pinned version as `agent-claude`
with `ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL` baked in. The split is deliberate: the ENDPOINT is a
property of the image, the CREDENTIAL is a property of the turn. That makes the
dangerous mix-up unrepresentable — a GLM VM cannot be handed an Anthropic
subscription token, and a claude VM cannot be pointed at z.ai. Asserted both
ways, because "the GLM VM must not carry CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN" is the
property that costs a credential if it ever stops holding.
Kimi stays refused. `KIMI_API_KEY` is set and Moonshot serves an
Anthropic-compatible API, but I have not verified its base URL against the
running service, and this function is precisely where guessing a URL is
expensive. It becomes an arm the day someone measures it.
`api.z.ai` joins the node's default egress allow-list. A default that cannot
run the images we ship is a trap rather than a policy — the alternative is an
operator discovering it as a hung agent with no model access.
**Per-role models for claws** (migration 0071). `template_roles` had no model
column, so `mint_team_from_template` bound every role of every mission team to
one literal — a template whose whole point is an independent reviewer minted a
reviewer sharing a model with the coder. A role may now name its own; roles that
say nothing still take the mint's default, so every template written before this
behaves exactly as it did. The literal is now that default rather than a
hardcode.
**A harness scenario for the roster flow.** `verify-mission-delivery.sh roster`
runs the whole Slice 5 loop — planner proposes, human approves, mission runs —
and asserts the roster LANDED on the mission row rather than trusting the API's
answer. That distinction is not theoretical: the first live approval returned an
error while leaving the proposal marked approved.
Built and proven on tank ahead of the deploy: `clawmates/agent-glm:dev` reports
`2.1.223` and `BASE=https://api.z.ai/api/anthropic`, and
`fc-build-rootfs.sh … glm 8G` boots a VM from it that has git, can write
/mission, and answers `claude --version`.
533 tests pass, clippy clean. Migration 0071.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
|
||
|
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 5
|
1797669296 |
feat(missions): Slice 5 — let a model size the mission's team
`routes/planner.rs` has had Opus proposing rosters since the Master Planner
shipped, and none of it ever reached a mission: the proposal lived in React state
and died with the tab. A mission's shape came from a team template instead —
fixed roles, and every claw minted `claude-sonnet-5` from a literal in
`mint_team_from_template`. That literal is why no mission has ever run more than
one provider.
A roster is `(topology_kind, [(role, backend)])`, which is exactly what the
composed executor already consumes: `Roster::graph` builds a `TopologyGraph` with
the backend in `attrs`, and `MicroVmTurnExecutor` reads `attrs["backend"]` per
node. So a verifier on another provider's rootfs stops being a bolt-on and
becomes a graph node — the correlated-failure break the independent judge exists
for, one layer down.
Three verbs, and the split is the point. **suggest** asks the model and persists
the answer, changing nothing. **decide** approves (writes `config.roster` and
switches the mission to the composed engine) or rejects. A proposal is never
applied on arrival: a model sizing a team is a suggestion about how many VMs to
boot, and this codebase treats model output that costs money as evidence for a
decision, not the decision.
Fail-closed at every seam, because each of these otherwise surfaces much later
and much more expensively:
- a backend no ONLINE node can boot is refused when PROPOSED, naming the ones
the fleet actually has. Placement would refuse it too — at launch, after the
roster was approved and someone believed the mission would run. The model is
handed that same list in its prompt, so the usual case never arises.
- an invented `topology_kind` is refused, not defaulted. `parse_topology_kind`
defaults to hub-spoke, which is right for a template we wrote and wrong for a
string a model just produced: running a `pipeline` proposal as a hub-and-spoke
changes what every node sees and nothing would say so.
- the roster is validated BEFORE it is stored, so a stored proposal is always
one that could be approved; and again at approval, against the fleet as it is
then — a node can go offline in between.
- `MAX_MEMBERS = 6`. Each member is a whole VM, not a subagent, and a model
asked to size a team proposes twelve happily.
Two properties live in SQL rather than in the handler: at most one approved
roster per mission (partial unique index — two approved rosters are two answers
to "what shape is this mission", and the executor reads one field), and
decide-once (`WHERE status = 'proposed'`, so a double-clicked approve claims
nothing the second time). Both tested against a real database, including that the
second approval is refused by Postgres rather than merely losing a race.
NEGATIVE CONTROL, run rather than assumed: with the roster preference removed
from `composed_graph`, `an_approved_roster_outranks_the_template` FAILS — 3 nodes
from the template instead of the roster's 2. A stored roster that is silently
ignored at launch is precisely the shape this project keeps paying for.
Not closed: per-role models for CLAWS. `template_roles` has no model column, so a
ZeroClaw team still mints one model for every role. The literal is now a named
constant that says so and points at the roster path, rather than sitting inline
where nobody reads it.
527 tests pass, clippy clean. Migration 0070. Not yet exercised against the
deployed stack — the route has never been called with a live model.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
|
||
|
Omar Sobh
|
f0dd0147f6 |
templates: 5 research team templates + category filtering
Adds the operator's five categorized research team archetypes:
1. codebase_research — code archeologist, architecture mapper,
flow tracer, vault scribe. Produces Obsidian vault entries
under Codebases/<repo>/ that make future missions faster.
2. papers_research — domain scout, paper reader, library curator.
Pulls arXiv / Semantic Scholar / conference proceedings, keeps
a structured local library under Papers/<topic>/.
3. insight_research — implementation tracker, novelty hunter,
publication drafter. Bidirectional loop that spots
publication-worthy novelty in our own implementations of
external papers.
4. continuous_research — signal harvester, ranker, digest writer.
Standing sweep of RSS + arXiv daily + GitHub trending; produces
a rolling ContinuousResearch/<date>/digest.md.
5. continuous_improvement — brain inspector, improvement proposer,
improvement evaluator. Standing self-audit that files level-up
proposals for the operator to review + measures the outcome.
Each template ships with role system_prompts + brain_seeds authored
in the same voice as the existing backend/frontend/etc templates —
evidence-first, redlines called out, no invention.
Schema + code:
- 0057_team_templates_category.sql — new column with
CHECK (research | development | security | ops). Existing rows
default to 'development'.
- team_templates::UpsertBuiltin + TeamTemplate carry category
(with default_category = 'development' fallback for
Serialize/Deserialize compatibility).
- team_template_loader reads `category = "..."` from the TOML;
absent defaults to 'development' so old templates keep working.
- Wizard step 3 filters:
Research teams panel → templates.filter(t.category==='research')
Development teams panel → templates.filter(t.category==='development')
Operator can no longer accidentally pick backend as their
"research team".
Test fixture updated with category="development".
The templates ship in the server image via the existing
`COPY templates /etc/clawmates/templates` line — no Dockerfile
change needed.
|
||
|
Omar Sobh
|
abe5b0ca54 |
test: fix assertion string for new on_launch error message
Multi-team refactor changed the error text from 'no team_id and no team_template_id' to 'no team_template_id and no config.phase_teams'. Assertion now just checks both key phrases. |
||
|
Omar Sobh
|
0ee689f590 |
missions: hard-require team template — block empty-team launches
Root-cause fix for the "mission runs with zero agents" bug. Three
enforcement layers now guarantee a launched mission has a team:
1. mission_orchestrator::on_launch — the previous
\`return Ok(None)\` when both team_id and team_template_id are
None is now \`return Err(...)\`. That branch was never a real
"auto-provision later" path; it was a silent no-op that let
the mission flip to running with nothing to run.
2. routes::missions::set_status — the draft→running transition
now (a) rejects with 400 when team_id + team_template_id are
both null, and (b) runs on_launch BEFORE flipping status +
returns 500 on failure. No more orphan "running" missions
with no materialization.
3. MissionWizard step 3 — removed the misleading "LLM
auto-provision" tile (fake code path). First real template is
pre-selected on mount; canNext requires teamTemplateId set;
empty state surfaces a red warning if no templates loaded.
4. MissionCanvas Launch button — disabled with a "No team" label
and explanatory tooltip when the mission has neither team_id
nor team_template_id (defense-in-depth for legacy rows or
direct-API missions).
Also flipped the mission_orchestrator test that expected
Ok(None) → now expects a specific error message.
Prod cleanup: reset the stuck mission
019f814c-d36f-7d60-8915-1ce100683133 (running with team_id=NULL) back
to draft so the operator can delete or attach a template.
Verified: cargo check --workspace + tsc + eslint all green;
mission_orchestrator test updated to match new contract.
|
||
|
Omar Sobh
|
d8c8793c4a |
ci fixes: cargo fmt, eslint entities, max-lines split
CI on
|
||
|
Omar Sobh
|
2b3ec27757 |
herdr phase 1c: wizard runtime picker + on_launch auto-dispatch
Closes the operator loop for the second-runtime path. Missions
created with runtime='local_herdr' now spawn a Herdr pane on their
target_node automatically on draft→running.
Frontend (MissionWizard):
- Step 4 grows a "Runtime" section above Schedule
- Radio: "Hosted (ZeroClaw)" default | "On a fleet node (Herdr)"
- Local-Herdr shows a dropdown of ONLINE nodes only (from
/api/nodes filtered by status='online')
- canNext blocks Next when local_herdr picked without a node
- Review step shows "Runtime: Herdr on <node-name>" or "Hosted"
- Empty-online-nodes state hints "Connect one from INFRA first"
Backend:
- mission_orchestrator::on_launch grows a NodeHub param; when
mission.runtime_kind='local_herdr' + target_node_id set +
hub present → calls fleet_herdr::dispatch(). Non-fatal:
logs and continues so a research_only mission with a Herdr
runtime chosen accidentally still boots the team.
- routes::missions::set_status passes state.node_hub through.
- Test call sites updated to pass None for the new param
(integration tests don't drive real fleet nodes).
CLI stub: on_launch currently hard-codes cli="claude" for the
Herdr pane. Phase 4 will read that from the team template so a
research team → kimi, gpu team → claude, etc.
Verified: cargo check --workspace + cargo test
-p cm-api --test mission_orchestrator + tsc --noEmit all green.
|
||
|
Omar Sobh
|
74ee990d7e |
tests: integration coverage for mission_orchestrator::on_launch
Real-Postgres end-to-end test locking in the missions arc's
draft→running orchestration contract. Three scenarios:
- on_launch_materializes_team_from_template — a mission with a
team_template_id and no team_id materializes exactly one member
per role, stamps template lineage onto the team row (template_id,
template_version, risk_profile, mcp_bundles), records
agent_template_link per claw, wires team_members, and binds
team_id back onto the mission.
- on_launch_is_idempotent — second invocation returns the same
team_id, no duplicate agents.
- on_launch_no_template_returns_none — mission with no template
and no team leaves the mission untouched (returns Ok(None)).
Uses cm-testkit's per-process Postgres testcontainer, so runs in CI
without any external infrastructure. Brain seeding is expected to
warn-and-continue in the sandbox (read-only FS for the HDF5 mkdir);
the mark_seeded assertion was intentionally dropped — the contract
the test locks in is "link row exists," not "seeding succeeded on
this specific filesystem."
Closes task #24.
|