Three threads, all of which end at the same place: a mission whose verifier does
not share a model with the coder it reviews.
**GLM has a credential contract now.** `microvm_credential_for` returned one env
var name, which quietly assumed every provider reads its secret from the same
place Anthropic does. It returns a `Credential { source, target }` instead —
z.ai's key lives in the server's `ZAI_API_KEY` and Claude Code reads it as
`ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN`, and collapsing those two names is what forces a guess at
the other end. A wrong guess here sends one provider's credential to another
provider's endpoint.
`images/agent-glm` is the same CLI at the same pinned version as `agent-claude`
with `ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL` baked in. The split is deliberate: the ENDPOINT is a
property of the image, the CREDENTIAL is a property of the turn. That makes the
dangerous mix-up unrepresentable — a GLM VM cannot be handed an Anthropic
subscription token, and a claude VM cannot be pointed at z.ai. Asserted both
ways, because "the GLM VM must not carry CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN" is the
property that costs a credential if it ever stops holding.
Kimi stays refused. `KIMI_API_KEY` is set and Moonshot serves an
Anthropic-compatible API, but I have not verified its base URL against the
running service, and this function is precisely where guessing a URL is
expensive. It becomes an arm the day someone measures it.
`api.z.ai` joins the node's default egress allow-list. A default that cannot
run the images we ship is a trap rather than a policy — the alternative is an
operator discovering it as a hung agent with no model access.
**Per-role models for claws** (migration 0071). `template_roles` had no model
column, so `mint_team_from_template` bound every role of every mission team to
one literal — a template whose whole point is an independent reviewer minted a
reviewer sharing a model with the coder. A role may now name its own; roles that
say nothing still take the mint's default, so every template written before this
behaves exactly as it did. The literal is now that default rather than a
hardcode.
**A harness scenario for the roster flow.** `verify-mission-delivery.sh roster`
runs the whole Slice 5 loop — planner proposes, human approves, mission runs —
and asserts the roster LANDED on the mission row rather than trusting the API's
answer. That distinction is not theoretical: the first live approval returned an
error while leaving the proposal marked approved.
Built and proven on tank ahead of the deploy: `clawmates/agent-glm:dev` reports
`2.1.223` and `BASE=https://api.z.ai/api/anthropic`, and
`fc-build-rootfs.sh … glm 8G` boots a VM from it that has git, can write
/mission, and answers `claude --version`.
533 tests pass, clippy clean. Migration 0071.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
`upsert_builtin` replaced the role set with DELETE + reinsert. That looks
equivalent to an upsert and is not: `agent_template_link` carries a plain FK
on (template_id, role_slot), so the delete is rejected as soon as one agent
has been minted from the template, rolling back the whole transaction.
The failure mode was silent and self-targeting. The loader logs the error and
continues, so the on-disk TOML and the DB drifted apart — and only for the
templates someone had actually used. Running the smoke mission against
insight_research is what put it on the boot log:
failed to load insight_research.toml: violates foreign key constraint
"agent_template_link_template_id_role_slot_fkey"
which also means that template never received the skill-name fix.
- Upsert each role in place via ON CONFLICT (template_id, slot), the table's
primary key.
- Prune only slots the TOML dropped, and skip a slot still referenced by a
live agent with a log line. Keeping one stale role row is a smaller failure
than discarding every edit to the template.
- Regression test drives the real sequence — upsert, mint an agent, link it,
upsert again — and asserts both the prompt and skill edits land. Verified to
fail without the fix with the same 23503 the server logged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Full-depth rename per the approved plan; the 'claw' product vocabulary
(claws, /claws routes, clawId, Claw Chat) stays — it is now the brand.
- Display brand: Clawmates (manifest, titles, hero, login/rail logo
'clawmates'); default host app.clawmates.work; registry
ghcr.io/clawmates
- Crates tc-* -> cm-* (16 crates + all imports); binaries
clawmates-server/broker/bundler; images clawmates/*; env prefix
CLAWMATES_* (+ CM_TEST_DATABASE_URL / CM_LIVE_LLM); config
clawmates.toml; helm chart deploy/helm/clawmates with clawmates-*
resources; db names clawmates*; sockets /run/clawmates; cookie
cm_session; kind cluster clawmates-test; seccomp node profile
clawmates-agent-profile.json
- All 9 Playwright brand assertions updated in lockstep; historical
spec document left untouched as the only remaining 'TeamClaw'
- Local env migrated: dev pg clawmates-dev-pg/clawmates_dev, shared
test server clawmates-test-pg, kind cluster recreated with image +
profile, compose images rebuilt under clawmates/*
Verified end to end: 161 Rust + 68 frontend tests, 29 Playwright
journeys, 4 live kind tests, helm/install/LOC/placeholder gates, and
the clean-room install rehearsal serving the clawmates login page from
a signed bundle of the rebuilt images.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <[email protected]>
