5 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 4.8	33224f7088	paper §7.4: topology x model grid — the interaction effect ... Crosses pipeline x debate with 3 model casts (Claude, GLM-4.7, heterogeneous) on a fixed decision task, judge-ranked 1-6. Central finding: the topology x model interaction is real and non-monotone — debate amplifies the strongest model (GLM-4.7: 2nd->1st) but degrades others (Claude: 3rd->last). The optimal configuration is a joint choice over {topology x per-role model}, which neither a topology-only nor model-only study can surface. 21 turns, sequential, within subscription quota caps. Safety invariant holds across all cells. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>	2026-06-17 14:36:06 -07:00
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 4.8	a14be693db	paper §7.3: per-role model leaderboard + GLM-5.2 flagship tier ... Single-role drafter on a fixed concision-weighted brief, one turn per backend, judge-ranked: GLM-4.7 > Claude > Kimi > GLM-5.2. Notable inversion — the flagship GLM-5.2 ranked last by over-writing the 25-word brief, underscoring that the best model is role/task/rubric-dependent. Adds the worker_glm5 (glm-5.2 Opus-class) tier to the example config. Gemini excluded this run (Google June-19 API-key-restriction 403; infra, not model). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>	2026-06-17 13:27:12 -07:00
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 4.8	7ae8f13db2	paper §7.2: heterogeneous cross-model topology result (per-role model) ... Adds the Phase C result: five backends (Claude/Kimi/GLM/Gemini/Groq) as interchangeable role-agents, per-node model selection via node.attrs["agent"], and a 3-config drafter->refiner sweep judged for quality. Heterogeneous GLM->Gemini won over the all-Claude baseline — an existence proof of "which model wins which role in which topology." Notes quota-bounded sweep scope as future work. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>	2026-06-17 12:59:49 -07:00
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 4.8	15f187e031	paper §7.1: live results on claude-sonnet-4-6 (real model + real judge) ... Ran the comparison harness end-to-end against a production model with an LLM-judge, deployed live: debate wins quality (0.840, ~3x tokens), pipeline is best value (0.790, cheapest), swarm is strictly dominated. Efficient frontier {debate, pipeline}; the ranking changes vs the offline proxy — confirming topology is a measurable quality/cost lever with §5 authority-invariance intact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>	2026-06-16 21:36:31 -07:00
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 4.8	2621e97ad2	docs(paper): draft "Dynamic Agentic Topologies" ... Working draft consolidating the platform: thesis, related work (ADAS/Darwin- Gödel/SwarmAgentic + Autonomous Organizational Evolution), the topology model + classifier, the safe-execution result (authority is topology-invariant — the §15 contract holds across any topology because the orchestrator only sequences safe turns), the comparison harness + Pareto + workflow-of-topologies, preliminary offline results, limitations/future (real-model runs, evolution), and a reproduction section. Empirical tables are offline/illustrative placeholders. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <[email protected]>	2026-06-15 21:10:19 -07:00