1678452a93aa9a306da23638c22b98b41d52139f
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Omar SobhandClaude Opus 5
|
ceec0423ad |
feat(teams): staff research phases with a research team
`research_only` is repo-less, one research phase, "produce a markdown
artifact" — and it defaulted to `rust_sdlc`. So it was staffed with a
planner, a coder, a tester, a reviewer and a committer, four of whom had
nothing to do, each carrying the code-and-commit skills its role is bound
to. Measured 2026-08-21: 9 distinct skills across 5 role prompts, ~50KB,
one applicable. That is what "most skills score not_applicable" in the
Skill-Use baseline has been measuring all along — the skills were
correctly bound to their roles; the roles were wrong for the workflow.
None of the three existing research templates fit, so this adds
`topic_research`: frame the brief into answerable questions, gather
evidence with the URL and the quoted passage, check every claim against
its source, write the report. Three roles, four skills, each checked
against its own `when_to_use` before binding — and two obvious candidates
deliberately NOT bound, because `executive-summary-writing` tells the
writer to discard any item not tied to a named project and
`signal-to-noise-ranking` scores relevance the same way. On a standalone
topic report that discards the deliverable.
`default_phase_teams` lets a recipe staff each phase PURPOSE separately,
resolved into `config.phase_teams` at create. A multi-phase recipe does
not have one job: `research_and_code`'s research phase spends a paragraph
of `task` telling its team not to change source files, because
`rust_sdlc` gave that phase a coder and a committer and they did what
coders do — mission 01a00c57 shipped both INT items during RESEARCH and
the coding phase then delivered +0/-0. Prose was the only lever
available; staffing is the actual one.
Also fixed in the three existing research templates, all verified rather
than inferred:
- `papers_research` bound `arxiv-daily` to its DOMAIN SCOUT. That
skill's entire content is "Do not search arXiv yourself — the harvest
already ran", and its `when_to_use` names Continuous Research
missions, which are the only ones the platform writes a harvest
manifest for. The role whose job is searching was bound a skill
forbidding it.
- Its PAPER READER was told to "fetch the PDF, extract text". The
runtime image has no pdftotext, no mutool and no pypdf — checked in
the container. Every paper would have hit the `[read: abstract only]`
fallback, which reads identically to the fallback working as designed.
- `insight_research` cross-referenced "our repos'" history. A mission
binds ONE repo (`missions.repo_id`).
- `codebase_research` wrote to "the Obsidian vault"; no vault is
mounted, and both it and `papers_research` were committing in "PRs",
which the platform does not open.
And `research_only` itself had neither `task` nor `done_when` — the same
defect `benchmark`, `security_hardening` and `research_and_code` were each
fixed for, and it was left out. A phase with no `done_when` is never
judged. It also still asked for `pdf`, a format nothing generates.
Two new guards, both negative-controlled: every team a recipe names must
exist (a typo currently only logs, and the mission is staffed by the
fallback crew looking deliberate), and every `default_phase_teams` key
must be a purpose `purposes_for` actually emits.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018i9Ten1LU4jUr5d7TAWda9
|
||
|
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 5
|
49bcf53b84 |
feat(missions): wire the workflow registry so phase config reaches the database
workflow_registry.rs had zero call sites -- lib.rs declared the module and
nothing ever called load() or get(). So templates/workflows/*.toml was never
read, and because the client's TEMPLATE_PRESETS carries only {kind, order_idx}
with no config, PhaseSpec.config defaulted to Value::Null and every
wizard-created mission stored a null mission_phases.config.
Every per-phase setting was therefore inert. `loop = "until_no_more_int_items"`
and `commit_policy = "on_green_tests"` described a scheduler that does not
exist AND had no path to the database. benchmark_runner and security_scan
already read phase_config(); they were reading from null.
- Mission create derives phases from the recipe when none are sent, and
backfills config per phase (matched on kind+order_idx, then kind) when the
caller sends shape without config. An explicit config always wins.
- phases_for_create takes Option<&WorkflowRecipe> rather than reaching for the
global, because the registry resolves its directory relative to the process
cwd -- which under cargo test is the crate root, not the repo root.
- GET /api/workflows serves the catalog; the wizard fetches it and falls back
to TEMPLATE_PRESETS. Adding a TOML now adds a template with no FE change.
- load() runs at boot so a malformed recipe appears in the boot log instead of
silently producing a mission with no phase config.
Also fixes a latent bug in all five recipes: `default_team_template` was
written below the first [[phases]] block, and TOML scopes a bare key after a
table header INTO that table -- so it parsed as
phases[last].config.default_team_template and the real field was always None.
Invisible while the registry was dead code. Moved above the phases, with a
test asserting it neither returns None nor leaks into a phase config.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
|
||
|
Omar SobhandClaude Opus 4.7
|
565f6cae65 |
slice 4: 5 workflow templates as TOML recipes + mission-launch orchestrator
Two things land together:
1. Ships the 5 workflow recipes as TOML files under
templates/workflows/*.toml:
- research_only (hub_spoke research → MD + PDF)
- research_and_code (research → coding loop until INT-XX drained)
- security_hardening (scan → research patches → coding with
reviewer approval + full MCP bundle)
- refactor (single-pass coding with dep audit
preamble + before/after benchmarks)
- benchmark (author + baseline benchmarks per stack)
Each declares phases[], per-phase config, default_team_template.
Loaded read-only into an in-memory registry (workflow_registry)
via OnceLock — no DB row per recipe.
2. Ships the mission-launch orchestrator that closes the loop from
Slice 3.5d's mechanics. When a mission transitions draft→running,
`mission_orchestrator::on_launch`:
- Reads mission.team_template_id (skips if unset)
- Loads the team template detail (roles + skills bindings)
- Builds a topology graph from role slots via cm_topology::build
- Inserts the teams row + stamps template_id/version/risk_profile/mcp_bundles
- For each role: agent insert, model binding, runtime provision
(opt-in via RuntimeProvisioner::from_env), brain_seed::ingest
(Slice 3.5d), agent_template_link::upsert (Slice 3.5d),
team_members bind, audit trail
- UPDATE missions SET team_id = ...
Wired into routes::missions::set_status when prior.status='draft'
and new='running'. Failures log + are non-fatal (mission still
flips to running so the user can inspect + retry).
With this, Slice 3.5d's brain-seed + link machinery actually gets
populated, and the MCP skills server's template-defaults-merge path
(Slice 3.5b/d) starts serving real bindings to real agents.
Follow-ups (Slice 5-8):
- Task-card parser watches run events for TASK/COMPLETED markers
→ mission_tasks rows
- PDF renderer worker turns MD artifacts into PDFs
- Before/after benchmark runner honors phases[].config.benchmark
- Security scan MCP bundle exposes cargo-audit/gitleaks/trivy/semgrep
- Level-up endpoints diff learned-vs-seeded via agent_template_link
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <[email protected]>
|